Kansas Congressman Derek Schmidt is pleased with a recent US Supreme Court decision to limit the authority of federal ...

The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on federal injunctions means ‘more work’ for Illinois Attorney General’s office and others ...

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson emerges as a strong voice on an unusually fractious U.S. Supreme Court. Dissenting — again — on ...

The Supreme Court on June 27 dealt a grievous blow to separation of powers by holding that federal courts cannot issue ...

The justices, after their term ends, greenlight deportations to war-ravaged South Sudan from a shipping container.

Politics and intellectual consistency go together like a banana on pizza. But the reaction from Democrats to last week’s ...

Unfortunately, lawmakers repealed it in 1976. Bring back the three-panel court for constitutional challenges.

The high court has given the president immunity and protected him from nationwide injunctions. Congress is giving ground on ...

The Constitution and precedent make clear presidential authority is limited, but justices are ignoring these boundaries.

When Supreme Court justices and even the Ninth Circuit use strong language to rein in activist judges, the end of the imperial judiciary is nigh.

Every word matters in critical legal documents, and no language is more pored over and parsed for meaning than that used in our U.S. Constitution.

A US judge ruled Wednesday that US President Trump's ban on asylum claims by migrants who cross the Mexico-U.S. border is ...