The law on the issue is well settled that demand of illegal gratification is sine qua non for constituting an offence under the Act 1988. Mere recovery of tainted money is not sufficient to convict ...

Undoubtedly, the reasoning given by the High Court does not deserve to be accepted for the reason that even if the complainant had a criminal background, he can still be forced by the officer of the ...

PATEL JOSHNABEN PRAVINKUMAR PATEL & ORS. Vs STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

Birender and Others (2020) 11 SCC 356, this Court considered in the facts before it as to whether the major sons of the deceased who ...

12.1 An Appellate Court has a statutory duty to deal with an Application for Additional Evidence on its merits. The application cannot be ignored while the Court proceeds to pronounce the final ...

SHATRUGHN YADAV Vs THE FERTILIZERS AND CHEMICALS TRAVANCORE LTD. (F.A.C.T.) AND OTHERS 36. The appeal is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited Vs. Rekha and Ors.

28. Learned District Judge has rightly observed that the responsibility to maintain the child, is an independent right of the father and it cannot be claimed to be adjusted against the amount of Rs. 8 ...

The call detail records further amplify the incriminating previous conduct of A1 on the date of incident. The records reveal that A1 was in constant touch with A2, A3 and A5 before the incident.

B. Clause 19 is declared to be valid and binding in term of the contract and no interest is payable on security deposit of Rs. 37 lakhs for the period up to expiry of three months from the date of ...

iv. Mobile numbers relied upon by the prosecution were not in the name of the accused persons and the Court has erred in convicting the appellants on mere suspicion; v. Mere mobile locations cannot be ...